Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Abel Forger vs Gabi Adrian Boitan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Forger vs Boitan analysis and find out who is favored!
Abel Forger vs Gabi Adrian Boitan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Forger 0 - 0 Boitan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Forger has won 48.67% of points on their second serve, while Boitan has won 50.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Forger, in recent form, has won 54.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Boitan has won 56.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.92% and 35.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Forger has saved 41.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boitan has saved 61.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Forger has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 5/ 10), with Boitan winning 67.95% (W/L 53/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Forger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Boitan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 116/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 12/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Forger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10), where as Boitan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.27% of matches (W/L 34/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Forger has played against opponents with an average rank of 129.33 while Boitan has played against players with an average rank of 242.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Forger has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boitan has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Forger has converted 53.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boitan has converted 47.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
427
Rank
427
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
29% (5-12)
Career Total W/L
64% (149-83)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
70% (31-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Abel Forger | Gabi Adrian Boitan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 70% (31/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 69% (66/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (57/56) | 58% (505/365) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 71% (29/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 9 | 103 |
| DFs per game | 0.5 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 159 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:10 | 1:36:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 144.5 | 209 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (218/368) | 66% (1728/2606) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (133/218) | 70% (1202/1728) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (73/150) | 51% (446/878) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (21/39) | 47% (151/318) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (168/372) | 44% (1176/2669) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 77% (17/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 72% (31/43) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 93% (30/28) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 7% (30/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 21% (14/3) |
Abel Forger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Abel Forger
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Cezar Gabriel Papoe
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Abel Forger
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Abel Forger
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bang Shuo Yin
Player
Abel Forger
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Abel Forger
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Abel Forger
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Cengiz Aksu
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabi Adrian Boitan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Ilya Snitari
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Francesco Ferrari
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Petr Nesterov
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Cezar Gabriel Papoe
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Niccolo Ciavarella
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
25
Total Points Won
20
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Florent Bax
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Aleksander Chayka
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Dominic Ducariu
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Ioan Alexandru Chirita
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Forger Vs Boitan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
